Earsonics SM3 earphone in Review – 2010’s Star Child
Back when Earsonicsâ€™ SM2 debuted, it rocked the professional earphone scene. Dry, neutral, detailed, powerful, and well-constfitructed (for a professional earphone), it sort of bagged the cat as it were. It was – and still is – one of the best professional earphones available. But Earsonics perfection-pursuing head, Franck Lopez, has looked to his laurels this year and debuted an even better earphone. The Earsonics SM3 betters the SM2 in almost every benchmark and along the way, has become a personal favourite of mine.
For better or worse, the SM2 and SM3 share the same desultory design. As noted in the SM2 review, this design does the job. Professional earphones truly are strange affairs, hinged by promises of quick repair (which they’ll need since they are packed in plastic). There are few exceptions to this rule. Truly, there are few professional monitors out there, but every one is constructed with the same ‘meh’ workmanship. The few well-known monitors are dominated by Westoneâ€™s otherwise excellent UM series. No thanks to that, however, Earsonics have followed Westoneâ€™s design cues. Their SM series is plastic, which is par for an unfortunately negligent course.
In the 2,5 months that Iâ€™ve hung onto this earphone (this review is long overdue), Earsonics have launched a few interim updates. The first is that current SM3â€™s ship with new dual-silicon flanges in addition to two ComplyÂ® tip sets. ComplyÂ® tips of course, isolate extremely well for stage work. A lot of audiophiles, however, prefer silicon. Franck delivered. The second change is that current SM3 models have been updated with slightly stronger construction, though youâ€™d not know it by glancing at the two models.
SensibilitÃ©: 122 dB/mW
RÃ©ponse en frÃ©quences: 20 Hz -18 kHz
ImpÃ©dance: 17 ohms
Driver: 3 drivers (3 way crossover)
LivrÃ© avec: wipes, tool, carrying case, 2 ComplyÂ® earpieces, 1 set of silicon flanges
Last time around, I chose certain albums to describe the SM2â€™s sound. In the case of the SM3, Iâ€™ll keep it simple. Iâ€™ll reference a few favourite albums, but I want to make it clear that in many ways the SM3 doesnâ€™t need an album to showcase what it can do. It simply and powerfully, just delivers music.
To prove that, Iâ€™ll lay out the arsenal of equipment and amplifiers I used to test these delightful earphones:
Others that I spent minutes rather than hours with include the RSA SR71A, RSA Protector, (and a few home-brew Japanese headphone amps).
The grit: drivability
The SM3 is an EASY to drive earphone – it sounds great from almost any source. At 122dB sensitivity @17Î©, it can pick up a bit of background noise, but miraculously, much less than many other earphones. Therefore, my hissy Sonyâ€™s and AMP3 are remarkably â€˜listenableâ€™ when paired with the SM3. The iPod touch and iPhone 3GS of course, are remarkably â€˜blackâ€™.
In other words, you donâ€™t need a portable headphone amp to make the SM3 really sing. Firstly, the SM3 gets bleedingly-loud from any source; secondly, it simply doesnâ€™t weigh down reasonably mature audio circuits. That isnâ€™t to say that a portable amp doesnâ€™t help things along. My personal (and tiny) favourite is the iBasso T3D, a perfectly balanced iem amplifier that pushes out great stereo image and perfect frequency response while maintaining a perky sound character. Paired with the iPod touch and SM3, there IS a tad more sparkle and in those frequencies where the iPod touch gets a little stuffy, the T3D opens the windows and lets the air in. For me, however, the difference isnâ€™t worth it â€“ and that is a good thing.
This mature behaviour is a plus, and hereâ€™s why: the SM3 is a great earphone for audiophiles who laze around on their beds with 20Kg of audio equipment digging into their sternums; but it is also a professional earphone. Stage musicians strap tiny wireless mic/amps to their sides; they donâ€™t have the â€˜luxuryâ€™ of pulling audio trailers behind them. Since the SM3 performs flawlessly from almost any source, the professional can hear her voice, her instrument with perfect clarity, which translates into better recordings/performances.
The Goo: What youâ€™ll hear
The SM3, I think, should be Earsonicsâ€™ poster boy. It is neutral. It is smooth. It is all that. It veers away from bass-stomping. It wonâ€™t punch treble-holes in your ears. What is left is expressive, is emotional, is perfection. If touch and feel is your thing (and who doesnâ€™t like touching?), the SM3 is your earphone. Beneath the thwap of every kick drum and under every fleshy guitar strum is sweetness that until now has played hooky from professional earphones from any manufacturer. I am quite ready to place my favourite tiara on the SM3. Percussion folks, and driving bass, are simple, ecstatic pleasures that shouldnâ€™t be missed at any price.
Considering the SM3â€™s got an extra low driver packed inside its compact frame, I expected substantially more bass slam. Instead, the SM3 surprises with low end balance and midrange poise. The extra driver, triple cross over, and magical engineering smooth out the wrinkles that slightly mar the SM2.
Continuing on, Earsonics reckon that the SM3â€™s low frequencies are more intense than the SM2, and I agree – to a point. Low notes are clearer, for sure. But I wouldnâ€™t categorise the SM3 as â€˜bassyâ€™, or â€˜thickâ€™ â€“ or maybe even â€˜intenseâ€™. It is just more controlled than the SM2. The SM2â€™s bass is chalky punkrock. The SM3 is a breathily mature.
The SM3 trumps its older sibling in vocals, in piano, and in strings. The midrange simply stands out with detail and *surprise surprise*, emotion. Go ahead, put on a soundtrack and be blown away by touch â€˜n feel that the SM3 delivers. The SM3 does great credit to the Braveheart soundtrack, an album the SM2 rendered too coolly. Then, SM3 trumps jazz, vocal and lounge with fantastic atmosphere. You can practically taste the smoke and sex from a late live performance.
If youâ€™re a Sci-Fi fan, youâ€™ll love the SM3. This pragmatic Star Child renders the space between instruments very well. There are several reasons, but I only truly understand one: the SM3â€™s overall dynamics are good. There is zero blur between its two most prevalent frequencies: lows and mids and despite a somewhat subdued treble, the feel of sound hunting your eardrums from every angle is intense.
As a consequence, the SM3 rocks for trance, IDM, and electronic. Dear God: please let me explain this well… I expected there to be a rub.. I mean there has to be since the SM3 is a pleasure for organic genres. Guitar, percussion and vocals are perfect. Electronic would sound too soft, too pleading. I was wrong, thankfully. Completely and stupidly wrong.
The SM3 has the speed, space, and somehow, the raw strength to beautifully render electronic instruments in any arrangement. The SM3 carves through any electronic barrier and delivers strong, sweet bass, pace, succinct instrument separation, and smooth transitions. It is, however, quite typically a balanced armature earphone: it won’t send waves of bass turbulence into your eardrum, but what arrives is splendidly ’round’ and full. Synthetic percussion, chimes, vocals â€“ all are pure bliss.
So, is there anything the SM3 canâ€™t do? Naturally.
The SM3 sits at the top of its class, rendering bass, midrange, and treble smoothly. Then, thereâ€™s space, attack, and decay in dealerâ€™s spades. But in the very same breath comes the rub: the SM3â€™s smoothness is also its weakness. I canâ€™t fault it exactly, but I can assure you grit and edge are missing. If your tastes in music tip toward the high end or toward what is often mistakenly called â€˜detailâ€™, then you may find the SM3 boring. The high end doesnâ€™t roll off per se, but it doesnâ€™t really stand out either. On the one hand, it is 100% fatigue free, smooth, and inviting. But, on the other hand, it pats the hands of otherwise showy high frequencies, shooing them to the back of the class. Shure SE530 fans should find the SM3 a wonderful step upward as it does render highs with more poise. But fans of bitey earphones such as the Victor FX500, or Etymotic ER4S, may be put off.
For me, Iâ€™ve found a happy medium: neutral, unwrinkled frequency response, an expansive headstage, and fatigue-free listening. All of this is A-Okay even for a person who entered high-end personal audio many years ago thanks to the bitey Etymotics ER4S. However, my preferences, which tend to sidle toward the teething toddler savour a few nips here and there.
Barnone, the SM3 is the most impressively thought out earphone Iâ€™ve HEARD. It isnâ€™t perfect, but it comes very close to perfection â€“ especially when considering its market at large. It not only sounds great, it drives easily from any source and picks up less hiss than many of its comrades. Earsonics hit the nail on the head; they shot two birds with one stone; they baked the perfect cupcake for Oprah. The SM3 is an earphone for audiophiles and professionals â€“ at least as it pertains to sound. Where they miss â€“ and this is a serious miss in my opinion â€“ is in their construction. If the SM3 was a mere audiophile fancy-pants earphone, all plastic might just be an â€˜oh wellâ€™ item. But as the SM3 is also a supremely engineered tool, Iâ€™d love to recommend it to professionals. Earsonics could shut the competition down by delivering a metal or impact-plastic housing with thick walls; they could make a bold statement that sound AND construction quality are paramount concerns. Unfortunately, they didnâ€™t. Even so, the SM3 is a great earphone and with proper care, should last a long time.
Despite my qualms about construction quality, and the fact that the SM3 eeks out a â€˜mereâ€™ GRAB, Iâ€™ve decided to brand an Editorâ€™s Choice award across this otherwise excellent earphone.
|Reviewed Ver:||SM3||Speaker type:||Triple Balanced armature|
|Price:||280â‚¬ ~400$ USD||Cable:||twisted rubber|